Sathfilms

Sathfilms

who knows anything

You can scroll the shelf using and keys

Get over it

October 30, 2008

This is from an article is in The Age newspaper:

Hit British TV comedy Little Britain has been accused of promoting prejudice and hatred.

“Little Britain does far more to promote racism, sexism, homophobia, ageism and classism than it does to satirise them – though it does do that from time to time.”

I don’t particularly like this show, but seriously, get over it. It’s clearly a comedy. If you have a problem with the assortment of illustrations showing the absurdity of prejudice then don’t watch it, and tell your kids not to watch it. As much as this show isn’t of my taste, it doesn’t “promote” anything apart from not taking yourself too seriously.

CNN vs Michael Moore

July 16, 2007

I’m sure a lot of people have already seen this, but it’s really interesting if you haven’t. Gupta’s “keeping him honest” piece has so many quick edits! I’m glad Michael Moore makes his documentaries with a clear argument and opinion; and it’s interesting to hear him speak his mind on television, and refuse to be edited in any way. I definitely find his films entertaining, and interesting and thought-provoking. Obviously, nothing should be taken at face value. I look forward to seeing his newest film, Sicko.

To save the few or the many?

May 31, 2007

Factory farming and the RSPCA « food for thought got me thinking. Really nice blog by the way.

Really interesting thoughts, that post linked above, and this one really opened my eyes about the money in circulation with regards to “good egg” endorsements and how that works. What really got me interested was the response from RSPCA that I thought was quite honest and reflects questions and dilemmas that I often think about. I’m not going to write about food I’m afraid, although I love food, however this topic, and the comment left by Jane Speechley got me thinking about another topic I read about after Pheona mentioned it in one of our classes earlier this week.

This article from the theage.com.au refers to a new stance taken up by Amnesty International as part of their “stop violence against women campaign”:

AMNESTY International is facing upheaval and mass resignations after it decided last month to advocate that abortion be decriminalised worldwide. (more…)

Dalai Lama urges Christians not to convert to Buddhism

May 13, 2007 — 7 Comments

Strange? Dalai Lama urges Christians not to convert to Buddhism - Not strange to me. And somewhat in contrast to something I looked at in a previous post of mine about the Dalai Lama.

I like the Dalia Lama’s view; however his point about the same teachings and values is argued against by many including the many interviewees in Lee Strobel’s “A Case For Faith,” which is a text that I’d like to write about in a future post. It’s a quite a biased text, but then how can a text called “A Case For Faith” not be biased? Nonetheless, the Dalai Lama’s view is similar to my own, but it can be argued with when looked at with regards to specific scripture instead of the bigger picture of religion in general, or particular religion – which is evident in Lee Strobel’s book.

I found this link from a forum which had the heading “Is it right for a parent to impose their religious beliefs on their child?” which I in-turn found because people were getting to my blog (which someone had linked to) from that forum. One person was arguing that parents inevitably impose their beliefs onto their children since most kids end up following the same religion as their parents. Another person - who linked to a post of mine - argued that regardless of that, there comes a time when a child becomes older and decides to think for themselves and hence create their own beliefs. I don’t know – as much as I know many people who have their own views as they get older (and some who opposed their parents’ views as a child) there are as many (if not more) that I know who simply follow what their parents believed was right – because, it is “right.” I don’t think that it’s necessarily a bad thing until the fact that someone is “right” makes another “wrong.” Nonetheless, parents will impose their beliefs since they will usually think that their view is the best (i.e. it works for them so why not for their child?), whether its narrow-minded (religious or not) or open-minded (religious or not) – so it’s just a matter of having faith in the human nature to raise questions about the meaning of life (instead of the human nature of residing in the bliss of ignorant certainty). One can only hope and try and questions.

Another interesting wikipedia page that talks about “notable converts to Christianity,” that I found on the forum.

Parker’s Media: The Times of Tyranny

May 7, 2007 — 5 Comments

Parker’s Media: The Times of Tyranny

Interesting read which talks about reducing discriminatory [Christian] texts in a University, which seems to thereby result in disrimination against Christians… 

What the? Does this mean all Christian thought is to be removed from texts, or just discriminatory writing? I find it strange that to reduce discrimination against others – which some fundamentalist Christian thought might support – there is a backwards discrimination onto Christians…? It’s understandable that open-mindedness should be encouraged, and discrimination should not be tolerated; so texts that comply with this should remain in circulation. I find that most religious thought that isn’t coming from a narrow-minded view usually teaches good values.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.